Всемирная психиатрия. №2 2014

Социальная нейронаука и ее потенциальный вклад в психиатрию

J.Cacioppo1, S.Cacioppo2, S.Dulawa3, A.Palmer4

1 Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5848 S. University Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA (США) 2 High Performance Electrical Neuroimaging Laboratory, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (США) 3 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (США) 4 Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (США)

Стр. 131-138

1636 просмотров

Опубликовано: 10 июня 2014

Аннотация / Abstract

a:2:{s:4:"TEXT";s:65533:"a:2:{s:4:"TYPE";s:4:"HTML";s:4:"TEXT";s:66410:"Перевод: Павличенко А.В. Резюме Большинство психических расстройств включают нарушение нормального социального поведения. Социальная нейронаука – междисциплинарная область, посвященная изучению биологических систем, лежащих в основе социальных процессов и поведения, а также влияния социального окружения на биологические процессы, здоровье и благополучие. За последнее годы в этой области было выполнено большое число исследований. Особенно активно изучаются такие области, как нейровизуализация мозга у здоровых детей и взрослых, животные модели социального поведения, больные с инсультами, визуализация у лиц с психическим расстройствами, изучение социальных детерминант периферической нервной и нейроэндокринной систем, а также иммунологических процессов. Хотя исследования в этих областях идут, в основном, в независимых направлениях, в настоящее время растет понимание того, что они взаимосвязаны друг с другом. В данной статье мы сосредоточим внимание на прогрессе и возможностях социальной нейронауки для психиатрии, включая иллюстрации с использованием примеров из нейровизуализационных и генетических исследований психических расстройств, число которых неуклонно растет. Мы также покажем необходимость нейровизуализационных и генетических исследований, нацеленных на выявление специфических составных процессов, лежащих в основе социальной жизни. Ключевые слова: социальная нейронаука, психиатрия, нейробиологические процессы, генетика, визуализация мозга. Человеческий мозг эволюционировал для того, чтобы мы могли быть внимательным к другим людям, думать о них и взаимодействовать с ними. Начиная с самого раннего возраста, мы накапливаем огромный практический опыт в этих процессах [1, 2]. Именно поэтому так легко недооценить сложность составных процессов, лежащих в основе социальной жизни. Как заметила Dunbar [3], сложности, связанные с пониманием того, как лучше найти еду, избежать...

Перевод: Павличенко А.В. Резюме Большинство психических расстройств включают нарушение нормального социального поведения. Социальная нейронаука – междисциплинарная область, посвященная изучению биологических систем, лежащих в основе социальных процессов и поведения, а также влияния социального окружения на биологические процессы, здоровье и благополучие. За последнее годы в этой области было выполнено большое число исследований. Особенно активно изучаются такие области, как нейровизуализация мозга у здоровых детей и взрослых, животные модели социального поведения, больные с инсультами, визуализация у лиц с психическим расстройствами, изучение социальных детерминант периферической нервной и нейроэндокринной систем, а также иммунологических процессов. Хотя исследования в этих областях идут, в �...

Материал для специалистов

Полный текст статьи доступен только зарегистрированным пользователям.

Вход / Регистрация

1. Cacioppo JT, Patrick B. Loneliness: human nature and the need for social connection. New York: WW Norton & Company, 2008.
2. Meltzoff AN, Moore MK. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 1977;198:75-8.
3. Dunbar RIM. The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Ann Hum Biol 2009;36:562-72.
4. Dunbar RIM, Shultz S. Evolution in the social brain. Science 2007;317:1344-7.
5. Cacioppo JT, Visser PS, Pickett CL. Social neuroscience: people thinking about thinking people. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006.
6. Adolphs R. Conceptual challenges and directions for social neuroscience. Neuron 2010;65:752-67.
7. Mendez MF, Manes F. The emerging impact of social neuroscience on neuropsychiatry and clinical neuroscience. Soc Neurosci 2011;6:415-9.
8. Birmingham E, Cerf M, Adolphs R. Comparing social attention in autism and amygdala lesions: effects of stimulus and task condition. Soc Neurosci 2011;6:420-35.
9. Cacioppo JT, Amaral DG, Blanchard JJ et al. Social neuroscience: progress and implications for mental health. Perspect Psychol Sci 2007;2:99-123.
10. Koelkebeck K, Hirao K, Kawada R et al. Transcultural differences in brain activation patterns during theory of mind (ToM) task performance in Japanese and Caucasian participants. Soc Neurosci 2011;6:615-26.
11. Wagner DD, Altman M, Boswell RG et al. Self-regulatory depletion enhances neural responses to rewards and impairs top-down control. Psychol Sci (in press).
12. Yeates KO, Bigler ED, Abildskov T et al. Social competence in pediatric traumatic brain injury: from brain to behavior. Clin Psychol Sci (in press).
13. Ito TA, Thompson E, Cacioppo JT. Tracking the timecourse of social perception: the effects of racial cues on eventrelated brain potentials. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2004;30:1267-80.
14. Ortigue S, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Patel N et al. Neuroimaging of love: fMRI metaanalysis evidence toward new perspectives in sexual medicine. J Sex Med 2010; 7:3541-52.
15. Cacioppo S, Frum C, Asp E et al. A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection. Sci Rep 2012;3:1-4.
16. He Y, Johnson MK, Dovidio JF et al. The relation between race-related implicit associations and scalp-recorded neural activity evoked by faces from different races. Soc Neurosci 2009;4:426-42.
17. Kendler KS, Jaffee SR, Romer D (eds). The dynamic genome and mental health. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
18. Reichenberg A, Mill J, MacCabe JH. Epigenetics, genomic mutations and cognitive function. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2009;14: 377-90.
19. Lubin FD. Epigenetic gene regulation in the adult mammalian brain: multiple roles in memory formation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2011;96:68-78.
20. Puckett RE, Lubin FD. Epigenetic mechanisms in experience-driven memory formation and behavior. Epigenomics 2011; 3:649-64.
21. Cole SW. Social regulation of human gene expression: mechanisms and implications for public health. Am J Public Health 2013;103(Suppl. 1):S84-92.
22. Cole SW, Hawkley LC, Arevalo JM et al. Social regulation of gene expression in human leukocytes. Genome Biol 2007;8: R189.
23. Cole SW, Conti G, Arevalo JM et al. Transcriptional modulation of the developing immune system by early life social adversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:20578-83.
24. Cole SW, Hawkley LC, Arevalo JMG et al. Transcript origin analysis identifies antigen-presenting cells as primary targets of socially regulated gene expression in leukocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:3080-5.
25. Irwin MR, Cole SW. Reciprocal regulation of the neural and innate immune systems. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11:625-32.
26. Slavich GM, Cole SW. The emerging field of human social genomics. Clin Psychol Sci (in press).
27. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC. Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2009;13:447-54.
28. Powell ND, Sloan EK, Bailey MT et al. Social stress up-regulates inflammatory gene expression in the leukocyte transcriptome via b-adrenergic induction of myelopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:16574-9.
29. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Perceived social isolation makes me sad: 5-year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. Psychol Aging 2010;25:453-63.
30. Vanderweele TJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA et al. A marginal structural model analysis for loneliness: implications for intervention trials and clinical practice. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011;79:225-35.
31. Ernst JM, Cacioppo JT. Lonely hearts: psychological perspectives on loneliness. Appl Prev Psychol 1998;8:1-22.
32. Ebmeier KP, Donaghey C, Steele JD. Recent developments and current controversies in depression. Lancet 2006; 367:153-67.
33. Coyne JC. Thinking interactionally about depression: a radical restatement. In: Joiner TJ, Coyne JC (eds). The interactional nature of depression: advances in interpersonal approaches. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1999: 365-92.
34. Davidson RJ, Pizzagalli D, Nitschke JB et al. Depression: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Annu Rev Psychol 2002; 53:545-74.
35. Hammen C, Brennan PA. Interpersonal dysfunction in depressed women: impairments independent of depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 2002;72:145-56.
36. Daley SE, Hammen C. Depressive symptoms and close relationships during the transition to adulthood: perspectives from dysphoric women, their best friends, and their romantic partners. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:129-41.
37. Joiner TE. Depression’s vicious scree: self-propagating and erosive processes in depression chronicity. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2000;7:203-18.
38. Maj M. Development and validation of the current concept of major depression. Psychopathology 2012;45:135-46.
39. Russo SJ, Nestler EJ. The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14:609-25.
40. Davidson RJ. Cognitive neuroscience needs affective neuroscience (and vice versa). Brain Cogn 2000;42:89-92.
41. Drevets WC. Neuroimaging and neuropathological studies of depression: implications for the cognitive-emotional features of mood disorders. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001;11:240-9.
42. Mayberg HS. Modulating dysfunctional limbic-cortical circuits in depression: towards development of brain-based algorithms for diagnosis and optimised treatment. BrMed Bull 2003;65:193-207.
43. Graham J, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Hagan C et al. Meta-analytic evidence for neuroimaging models of depression: state or trait? J Affect Disord 2013;151:423-31.
44. Rive MM, van Rooijen G, Veltman DJ et al. Neural correlates of dysfunctional emotion regulation in major depressive disorder. A systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (in press).
45. Cardoso de Almeida JR, Phillips ML. Distinguishing between unipolar depression and bipolar depression: current and future clinical and neuroimaging perspectives. Biol Psychiatry 2013;73:111-8.
46. Gotlib IH, Joormann J. Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2010; 6:285-312.
47. Phillips ML, Drevets WC, Rauch SL et al. Neurobiology of emotion perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54:504-14.
48. Phillips ML, Drevets WC, Rauch SL et al. Neurobiology of emotion perception II: Implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54:515-28.
49. Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:242-9.
50. Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. The neural architecture of emotion regulation. In: Gross JJ, Buck R (eds). The handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford, 2007:87-109.
51. Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14:365-76. 137
52. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL. Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 1986;9:357-81.
53. Bora E, Y€ucel M, Fornito A et al. Gray matter abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of voxel based morphometry studies. J Affect Disord 2012;138:9-18.
54. Stefurak T, Mikulis D, Mayberg H et al. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease dissociates mood and motor circuits: a functional MRI case study. Mov Disord 2003;18:1508-16.
55. Seminowicz DA, Mayberg HS, McIntosh AR et al. Limbic-frontal circuitry in major depression: a path modeling metanalysis. Neuroimage 2004;22: 409-18.
56. Mayberg HS, Liotti M, Brannan SK et al. Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:675-82.
57. Phillips ML, Ladouceur CD, Drevets WC. A neural model of voluntary and automatic emotion regulation: implications for understanding the pathophysiology and neurodevelopment of bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2008;13: 833-57.
58. Sullivan P, Neale M, Kendler K. Genetic epidemiology of major depression: review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:1552-62.
59. Levinson DF. The genetics of depression: a review. Biol Psychiatry 2006;60:84-92.
60. Todd RD, Botteron KN. Etiology and genetics of early-onset mood disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2002; 11:499-518.
61. Hart AB, de Wit H, Palmer AA. Candidate gene studies of a promising intermediate phenotype: failure to replicate. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38:802-16.
62. Pezawas L, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Drabant EM et al. 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci 2005;8:828-34.
63. Karg K, Burmeister M, Shedden K et al. The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited: evidence of genetic moderation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68:444-54.
64. Hek K, Demirkan A, Lahti J et al. A genome-wide association study of depressive symptoms. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 73:667-78.
65. Klein C. The promise and limitations of genome-wide association studies. JAMA 2012;308:1867.
66. Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium, Ripke S, Wray NR et al. A megaanalysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2013;18:497-511.
67. Smoller JW, Craddock N, Kendler K et al. Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 2013;381:1371-9.
68. Boomsma DI, Willemsen G, Dolan CV et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to loneliness in adults: the Netherlands twin register study. Behav Genet 2005;35:745-52.
69. Distel MA, Rebollo-Mesa I, Abdellaoui A et al. Familial resemblance for loneliness. Behav Genet 2010;40:480-94.
70. Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG, Decety J. Social neuroscience and its relationship to social psychology. Soc Neurosci 2010; 28:675-85.
71. Cleckley H. The mask of sanity. St. Louis: Mosby, 1976.
72. Hare RD. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist - Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health System, 1991.
73. Ermer E, Kiehl KA. Psychopaths are impaired in social exchange and precautionary reasoning. Psychol Sci 2010;21: 1399-405.
74. Burris CT, Rempel JK, Munteanu AR et al. More, more, more: the dark side of self-expansion motivation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2013;39:578-95.
75. Sato JR, de Oliveira-Souza R, Thomaz CE et al. Identification of psychopathic individuals using pattern classification of MRI images. Soc Neurosci 2011;6:627-39.
76. Sobhani M, Bechara A. A somatic marker perspective of immoral and corrupt behavior. Soc Neurosci 2011;6:640-52.
77. Vieira JB, Almeida PR, Ferreira-Santos F et al. Distinct neural activation patterns underlie economic decisions in high and low psychopathy scorers. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (in press).
78. Marsh AA. What can we learn about emotion by studying psychopathy? Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:181.
79. Boccardi M, Ganzola R, Rossi R et al. Abnormal hippocampal shape in offenders with psychopathy. Hum Brain Mapp 2010;31:438-47.
80. Decety J, Skelly LR, Kiehl KA. Brain response to empathy-eliciting scenarios involving pain in incarcerated individuals with psychopathy. JAMA Psychiatry 2013;70:638-45.
81. Veit R, Lotze M, Sewing S et al. Aberrant social and cerebral responding in a competitive reaction time paradigm in criminal psychopaths. Neuroimage 2010;49: 3365-72.
82. Veit R, Flor H, Erb M et al. Brain circuits involved in emotional learning in antisocial behavior and social phobia in humans. Neurosci Lett 2002;328:233-6.
83. Birbaumer N, Veit R, Lotze M et al. Deficient fear conditioning in pyschopathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:799-805.
84. Lykken DT. The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
85. Levenston GK, Patrick CJ, Bradley MM et al. The psychopath as observer: emotion and attention in picture processing. J Abnorm Psychol 2000; 109: 373-85.
86. Morgan AB, Lilienfeld SO. A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clin Psychol Rev 2000; 20: 113-36.
87. Raine A, Lencz T, Bihrle S et al. Reduced prefrontal gray matter volume and reduced autonomic activity in antisocial personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:119-27.
88. Hicks BM, Carlson MD, Blonigen DM et al. Psychopathic personality traits and environmental contexts: differential correlates, gender differences, and genetic mediation. Personal Disord 2012;3:209-27.
89. Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB et al. Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Int J Impot Res 2005;17:39-57.
90. Nicolosi A, Laumann EO, Glasser DB et al. Sexual behavior and sexual dysfunctions after age 40: the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Urology 2004;64:991-97.
91. Hatfield E, Rapson RL. Passionate love, sexual desire, and mate selection: crosscultural and historical perspectives. In: Noller P, Feeney J (eds). Frontiers of social psychology close relationships. Hove: Psychology Press, 2006:227-44.
92. Cacioppo S, Couto B, Bolmont M et al. Selective decision-making deficit in love following damage to the anterior insula. Curr Trends Neurol (in press).
93. Cacioppo S, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Frum C et al. The common neural bases between sexual desire and love: a multilevel kernel density fMRI analysis. J Sex Med 2012;9:1048-54.
94. Ortigue S, Bianchi-Demicheli F. The chronoarchitecture of human sexual desire: a high-density electrical mapping study. Neuroimage 2008; 43: 337-45.
95. Stoleru S, Redoute J, Costes N et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in men with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Psychiatry Res 2003;124:67-86.
96. Redouté J, Stoléru S, Pugeat M et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in treated and untreated hypogonadal patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2005; 30: 461-82.
97. Arnow BA, Millheiser L, Garrett A et al. Women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder compared to normal females: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience 2008;158: 484-502.
98. Bianchi-Demicheli F, Cojan Y, Waber L et al. Neural bases of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women: an event related FMRI study. J Sex Med 2011;8:2546-59.
99. Pfaus JG. Pathways of sexual desire. J Sex Med 2009;6:1506-33.
100. Barlow DH. Causes of sexual dysfunction: the role of anxiety and cognitive inference. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986; 54:140-8.
101. Masters W, Johnson V. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970.
102. Decety J, Cacioppo J. Frontiers in human neuroscience: the golden triangle and beyond. Perspect Psychol Sci 2010;5: 767-71.

ЖУРНАЛЫ

ИНТЕРАКТИВ

СПЕЦИАЛИЗАЦИИ

ИЗДАНИЯ-ПАРТНЕРЫ

Социальная нейронаука и ее потенциальный вклад в психиатрию

Материал для специалистов

ЖУРНАЛЫ

ИНТЕРАКТИВ

СПЕЦИАЛИЗАЦИИ

ИЗДАНИЯ-ПАРТНЕРЫ

Социальная нейронаука и ее потенциальный вклад в психиатрию

Материал для специалистов

Con-Med Passport